The debates are carried out in the “blogosphere,” which, I think, is one of the newer school vehicles. They seem to be carried out by individuals that are actively engaged in using or experimenting with the new tools. Everyone trying to learn about how to leverage these tools to displace old tools or complement them (I won’t get into that debate right now).
The odd thing is these discussions/arguments are among people who have already “drunk the Kool Aid,” and are asking for second helpings.
The more odd thing is the people that should be really hearing/listening to these debates will never hear them, because they aren’t here.
Many of my customers are still learning how to spell www (OK, I’m exaggerating a little). When I talk to them, very few are reading blogs. Very few are leveraging tools like LinkedIn–except when they lose their jobs then try to expand their networks, not really leveraging LinkedIn for what it can do. They are not driving business strategies that embrace and exploit the power of these tools.
Those are the people we need to be talking to, and we need to reach them where they are at — and it’s not here.
We can’t afford to ignore them, they represent the bulk of the business community.
So these debates in the “blogosphere” about who gets it and who doesn’t always strike me as odd. Clearly, we all get it, but may have differing positions. Wouldn’t we all be better served by spending our time trying to figure out how to reach out to the people who aren’t here and get them here and engaged?