Skip to content

Prescriptive Selling

by David Brock on April 20th, 2016
prescription

I’m seeing a trend toward increasing prescription in selling.  By that, I mean marketing, sales enablement, or management are prescribing the activities, actions, scripts, conversations their people should be having.  Many of the new technologies seem very focused at providing prescriptive guidance to the conversations sales people have with prospects and customers.

At it’s simplest level, it is “Do this, Don’t do that….”

At much higher levels, there are very richly scripted conversations–which must be working at some level, otherwise why would they be so popular.  Most of the situations I see these applied to are transactional types of buying, or focused on a very specific program.

I wonder about this approach, however, particularly the ability to achieve long term growth and success in complex B2B discussions.

When we talk about effective coaching, we always contrast the “non-directive” and “directive” techniques.  Non-directive focus on getting the person to think critically about a situation, to assess, evaluate,  and develop their own answers and approaches.  It’s based on the principle, “Give a person a fish and they eat for a day, teach a person to fish and they eat for a lifetime.”  Non-directive coaching is very powerful in developing the long term capability of sales people to figure things out themselves.

By contrast, “Directive” techniques are precisely that.  The sales person is told exactly what to do and expected to execute with precision.  Experts say, directive techniques are problematic.  First, the direction has to be precisely on target, otherwise the person is likely to fail.  Second, is the issue of ownership.  The sales person has less ownership in the outcomes.  Third, it doesn’t grow the capabilities of sales people, they can only do what they are told to do and don’t have the ability to do more.  Fourth, it builds resentment in the individual.  People don’t like being told what to do, particularly those developing as professionals.

As I reflect on what we are trying to achieve in developing our people, coaching, teaching, and developing them to achieve higher levels of performance—and the current trend for highly prescriptive sales enablement, they seem completely at odds.

Perhaps that’s good.

Prescriptive selling works, at some level, it would be silly to disregard this.  I worry about the trends I’m seeing in sales tools, marketing and sales enablement in trying to slam highly prescriptive approaches to everything our sales people do.  I don’t believe it enables us to create the greatest value for our customers.  I don’t believe it develops deep strength and capability in our people.

Am I missing something?

Book CoverFor a free peek at Sales Manager Survival Guide, click the picture or link.  You’ll get the Table of Contents, Foreword, and 2 free Chapters.  Free Sample

Be Sociable, Share!
6 Comments
  1. I could be wrong about this, Dave, but I suspect some of this is a reaction to the inability of sales executives to hire salespeople that have the skills and traits to get the job done.

    ESR (when we were around) determined that 20 to 33% of salespeople, depending on the industry, were just not suited for the positions they held. That means no matter what training, coaching, tools, technology, mentorship, they were given, they couldn’t be successful. But that doesn’t mean that companies who don’t know how to hire have given up trying to bolster up sales mis-hires.

    So, I think this prescriptive selling is a band-aid for not having the right people on the job.

    (This is not to say that qualified and competent salespeople don’t need resources, process, tools, etc. to get the job done.)

    Just my humble opinion.

    Dave

    • If one were cynical Dave, one might think along the following lines: What a great way to significantly reduce the cost of selling! We could downgrade the sales force, requiring less skill/capability and turn them into people that could only execute the prescription very well.

      But then as you play with that, there are some interesting challenges/opportunities:

      1. If things were that prescriptive, then why do we need people at all, we can convert the process into web based transactions.
      2. But what about those situations that are more complex, those that are complex B2B problems/solutions, where many diverse interests have to be understood, aligned, and moved through the buying process.
      3. What if how we sell and how we engage the customers became the core to our differentiation and value creation.
      4. But 2/3 require a dramatically different kind of individual than 1. One capable of creative/critical thinking, high business acumen, great problem solving, strong conflict management, strong relationship management—to name a few skills. This is very different than the individual for 1.
      5. Where do we source those for 4? Clearly, the people for 1 don’t have those skills and are unlikely to develop them. So we have to source differently, then look at different on-boarding, etc.
      6. Then one thinks about career pathing for 1—-Hmmm……..

      But of course, we aren’t cynical. 😉

  2. An overly prescriptive model feels like a robot is selling. Agile is the word which comes to mind to effectively engage customers. A playbook is important (science) but we need to call audibles (art). Customer engagement is earned and developed over time through listening & learning before prescribing. Prescribing can be a series of trial balloons (more art) before we are aligned & effectively engaged with our customer(s). Great sales reps have the innate skills but average sales reps need help delivering insight and understanding if that insight is actually making an impact.

    • I couldn’t agree with you more, Bill. There are very powerful ways to leverage prescription in sales. However, too much of it really focuses on creating robots or dumbing down our sales organizations.

  3. I am not a fan of scripted selling.
    I believe it leads to too much focus on my message and not enough focus on customer requirements.

    I take the point made by Dave Stein that maybe it reflects the quality of salespeople being hired.

    I guess it might depend on the industry you’re selling into.

    Some products are highly technical and require selling and fitting into customer requirements. Others are simpler and either fit or they don’t.

    Maybe this prescriptive selling technique indicates there are less and less specialties being sold these days (maybe less innovation? Or copying of successful products) although, then again, one of the skills of the salesperson is to differentiate the product by selling themselves, which you can’t do from a script.

    • Thanks Greg. I tend to think much of this is consciously or unconsciously oriented to dumbing down the sales organization.

Leave a Reply

Note: XHTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS