<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sales Management, It&#8217;s About Inspecting The Process, Not Transactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/</link>
	<description>Making A Difference - In Business and Your Personal Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:27:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brock</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9388</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-9388</guid>
		<description>David, thanks for the comment.  I couldn&#039;t agree more--each person is different, so we have to adopt our coaching method to each person in order to increase our ability to connect with them.  This doesn&#039;t mean we have different sales processes--after all, the sales process is based on our best practice/experience in closing business.  We can&#039;t drive the highest levels of performance by having each person adopt a different process--but as you point out, our coaching approach does have to be different.

Thanks for joining the discussion.  Regards, Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, thanks for the comment.  I couldn&#8217;t agree more&#8211;each person is different, so we have to adopt our coaching method to each person in order to increase our ability to connect with them.  This doesn&#8217;t mean we have different sales processes&#8211;after all, the sales process is based on our best practice/experience in closing business.  We can&#8217;t drive the highest levels of performance by having each person adopt a different process&#8211;but as you point out, our coaching approach does have to be different.</p>
<p>Thanks for joining the discussion.  Regards, Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david barrielle</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-9387</link>
		<dc:creator>david barrielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-9387</guid>
		<description>David, like this article and want to share my ideas. I am definitely in line with your comment on spending every minutes listen and catching people doing things right rather than to be on the pure operational side. 
If manager are there to set a direction and not their own direction, we have to be aware that every people in your team is getting a different expectation and background. Your team is not homogenous in terms of experience and request. i do personally believe - as sales manager- need to be adaptative,  ready to pin point and be directive with new joiner  and might be on delegating role with experience people. The most important area is make sure our people have the right behavior. So set clear priorities, review it periodically and be there when they knocked to your door.
Hope my comments make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, like this article and want to share my ideas. I am definitely in line with your comment on spending every minutes listen and catching people doing things right rather than to be on the pure operational side.<br />
If manager are there to set a direction and not their own direction, we have to be aware that every people in your team is getting a different expectation and background. Your team is not homogenous in terms of experience and request. i do personally believe &#8211; as sales manager- need to be adaptative,  ready to pin point and be directive with new joiner  and might be on delegating role with experience people. The most important area is make sure our people have the right behavior. So set clear priorities, review it periodically and be there when they knocked to your door.<br />
Hope my comments make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brock</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-8776</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-8776</guid>
		<description>Gabriel, thanks for joining the discussion and the thoughtful comment.  The job of the manager is simply too large and complex to be micromanaging each deal.  They need to focus their time on coaching and developing their people to perform at the highest levels with the appropriate amount of supervision.  

Thanks for joining the discussion, I hope to see you here frequently!  Regards, Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabriel, thanks for joining the discussion and the thoughtful comment.  The job of the manager is simply too large and complex to be micromanaging each deal.  They need to focus their time on coaching and developing their people to perform at the highest levels with the appropriate amount of supervision.  </p>
<p>Thanks for joining the discussion, I hope to see you here frequently!  Regards, Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Ricci</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-8773</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-8773</guid>
		<description>I applaud these realizations. Almost every company I have worked for had pushed for deal management as a priority. Even when outcomes are pathetic the corporate philosophy is unwavering. It is my opinion that many managers do not understand process evaluation and symptoms of failure. How can they, all of us are promoted out of sales for being successful at tactical sales processes.

Look at ads for sales management types, and what they place high value on. The words &quot;hands on &quot; appear almost everywhere. Hands on is a key symptom for driving failure. Overview, systems analysis, infrastructure development, sales overhead reduction, report efficiency development, goal, objective, strategy development for each sale person, definition of the sales process, dynamic tacking of the location of customers in the process etc all drive huge performance leaps within sales organizations. One most often overlooked is sales office design to optimize communication amongst interdependent players on the sales team. 

There is certainly more in the management equation. However, I have never worked for a company that rewards a sales manager for execution at this level. They want manager in the field making calls and solving the problems that the field people they hire should be solving. Many sales managers just keep being sales guy after they get the title. When things get tough, they fail, because they have not executed on organizational development necessities. In the mean time they are the fair haired boy of upper management, usually to the CEO level because they are so present in the field. Until the fundamentals of excellent sales management are better known and accepted sales management will be fraught with misconception and the illusion of time management and load issues. As a sales manager, ones main responsibility is to build the complete infrastructure  or repair the infrastructure of the organization to be managed. That is the Goal and when met the outcome of tactical sales efforts will quantum leap. 

How can this be driven in everyday sales activities. Simply make the categories above the basis of compensation for sales management. Compensation properly directed will drive outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud these realizations. Almost every company I have worked for had pushed for deal management as a priority. Even when outcomes are pathetic the corporate philosophy is unwavering. It is my opinion that many managers do not understand process evaluation and symptoms of failure. How can they, all of us are promoted out of sales for being successful at tactical sales processes.</p>
<p>Look at ads for sales management types, and what they place high value on. The words &#8220;hands on &#8221; appear almost everywhere. Hands on is a key symptom for driving failure. Overview, systems analysis, infrastructure development, sales overhead reduction, report efficiency development, goal, objective, strategy development for each sale person, definition of the sales process, dynamic tacking of the location of customers in the process etc all drive huge performance leaps within sales organizations. One most often overlooked is sales office design to optimize communication amongst interdependent players on the sales team. </p>
<p>There is certainly more in the management equation. However, I have never worked for a company that rewards a sales manager for execution at this level. They want manager in the field making calls and solving the problems that the field people they hire should be solving. Many sales managers just keep being sales guy after they get the title. When things get tough, they fail, because they have not executed on organizational development necessities. In the mean time they are the fair haired boy of upper management, usually to the CEO level because they are so present in the field. Until the fundamentals of excellent sales management are better known and accepted sales management will be fraught with misconception and the illusion of time management and load issues. As a sales manager, ones main responsibility is to build the complete infrastructure  or repair the infrastructure of the organization to be managed. That is the Goal and when met the outcome of tactical sales efforts will quantum leap. </p>
<p>How can this be driven in everyday sales activities. Simply make the categories above the basis of compensation for sales management. Compensation properly directed will drive outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sales Management &#8212; Managing The Contradictions — Future Selling Institute</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-7916</link>
		<dc:creator>Sales Management &#8212; Managing The Contradictions — Future Selling Institute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-7916</guid>
		<description>[...] little over a week ago, I wrote Sales Management, It’s About Inspecting The Process, Not Transactions.  In talking to many people who contacted me about the article, we ended up talking about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little over a week ago, I wrote Sales Management, It’s About Inspecting The Process, Not Transactions.  In talking to many people who contacted me about the article, we ended up talking about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brock</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-3239</guid>
		<description>Dan, thanks for joining the discussion, you raise a lot of interesting points.  I wanted to address a few:

1.  If the organization has no sales process in place, one of the sales manager&#039;s highest priorities is to put one in place, train the sales people and make sure it is used.  Without a strong sales process, it is impossible to manage for performance.  It is impossible to make sure the organization and individuals are working as effectively and efficiently as possible.
2.  Having a process in place has nothing to do with where the company is in its life cycle, product cycle or tenure.  One of the challenges of early stage companies is to figure out what this is as quickly as possible, so that it can scale rapidly.  For more mature companies, the process is required for efficient effective growth.  It is important to recognize the process changes through the company, product cycles.  As you imply, too many organizations put a process in place then fail to keep it updated, reflecting shifts in their markets, competition, strategies and priorities.  Part of the &quot;stewardship&quot; role of management is to make sure the processes reflect current realities and position the organization to compete effectively in the future.
3.  Your point about managing process and activity (teaching and coaching) is well taken.  Managers need to do all of this.  However, to often they focus only on activity, and micromanaging it.  This is a prescription for failure, from many dimensions.  One is they take the responsibility/accountability out of the hands of the sales people (who may be pleased to delegate it up).  Two is the numbers just go against the sales manager---it is impossible, by definition, for them to be involved in all those activities  (I wrote a blog on the sales manager superman syndrome).  The only way, as a result, the manager can be sure things are &quot;in control&quot; is by making sure the processes are in place and to inspect the process.
4.  Sales management overload--for first time managers is a real problem.  Most often, a large part of the problem is they don&#039;t understand what their job is or how to do it (shame on senior management).  Typically, they have been sales people who have been promoted.  Their natural inclination is to keep doing what they had been doing, but more, faster.....  Clearly a prescription for overload and personal/organizational failure.  The manager must learn their job is to get things done through their people.  Making sure the right processes are in place, the right systems and tools, the right training, coaching, etc. is critical.  Making sure people are leveraging these is the only way to drive performance.  

Dan, thanks so much for your comment.  You raised some great points that are critical to the sales manager&#039;s success.  Please keep visiting and contributing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, thanks for joining the discussion, you raise a lot of interesting points.  I wanted to address a few:</p>
<p>1.  If the organization has no sales process in place, one of the sales manager&#8217;s highest priorities is to put one in place, train the sales people and make sure it is used.  Without a strong sales process, it is impossible to manage for performance.  It is impossible to make sure the organization and individuals are working as effectively and efficiently as possible.<br />
2.  Having a process in place has nothing to do with where the company is in its life cycle, product cycle or tenure.  One of the challenges of early stage companies is to figure out what this is as quickly as possible, so that it can scale rapidly.  For more mature companies, the process is required for efficient effective growth.  It is important to recognize the process changes through the company, product cycles.  As you imply, too many organizations put a process in place then fail to keep it updated, reflecting shifts in their markets, competition, strategies and priorities.  Part of the &#8220;stewardship&#8221; role of management is to make sure the processes reflect current realities and position the organization to compete effectively in the future.<br />
3.  Your point about managing process and activity (teaching and coaching) is well taken.  Managers need to do all of this.  However, to often they focus only on activity, and micromanaging it.  This is a prescription for failure, from many dimensions.  One is they take the responsibility/accountability out of the hands of the sales people (who may be pleased to delegate it up).  Two is the numbers just go against the sales manager&#8212;it is impossible, by definition, for them to be involved in all those activities  (I wrote a blog on the sales manager superman syndrome).  The only way, as a result, the manager can be sure things are &#8220;in control&#8221; is by making sure the processes are in place and to inspect the process.<br />
4.  Sales management overload&#8211;for first time managers is a real problem.  Most often, a large part of the problem is they don&#8217;t understand what their job is or how to do it (shame on senior management).  Typically, they have been sales people who have been promoted.  Their natural inclination is to keep doing what they had been doing, but more, faster&#8230;..  Clearly a prescription for overload and personal/organizational failure.  The manager must learn their job is to get things done through their people.  Making sure the right processes are in place, the right systems and tools, the right training, coaching, etc. is critical.  Making sure people are leveraging these is the only way to drive performance.  </p>
<p>Dan, thanks so much for your comment.  You raised some great points that are critical to the sales manager&#8217;s success.  Please keep visiting and contributing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Tyre</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Tyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 11:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>Managing process is dependent on a process being in place. This is highly dependent on on where the company, product cycle and the tenure of the sales organization. Sales Managers need to be leaders; they need to manage process and activity; they need to teach &amp; coach. It is extremely helpful if they are active in enough sales transactions to be credible to the sales organization and the customers. Sales management overload is one of the biggest problems we face, especially with first time managers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Managing process is dependent on a process being in place. This is highly dependent on on where the company, product cycle and the tenure of the sales organization. Sales Managers need to be leaders; they need to manage process and activity; they need to teach &amp; coach. It is extremely helpful if they are active in enough sales transactions to be credible to the sales organization and the customers. Sales management overload is one of the biggest problems we face, especially with first time managers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sales Management&#8212;Managing The Contradictions &#124; Partners in EXCELLENCE Blog</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Sales Management&#8212;Managing The Contradictions &#124; Partners in EXCELLENCE Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-784</guid>
		<description>[...] The Contradictions by David Brock on November 9th, 2009   A little over a week ago, I wrote Sales Management, It’s About Inspecting The Process, Not Transactions.  In talking to many people who contacted me about the article, we ended up talking about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Contradictions by David Brock on November 9th, 2009   A little over a week ago, I wrote Sales Management, It’s About Inspecting The Process, Not Transactions.  In talking to many people who contacted me about the article, we ended up talking about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Thoreson</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Thoreson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Good content... I do a blog: www.YourSalesManagementGuru.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good content&#8230; I do a blog: <a href="http://www.YourSalesManagementGuru.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.YourSalesManagementGuru.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sales Management, It&#39;s About Inspecting The Process, Not &#8230; &#171; Improvers</title>
		<link>http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/sales-management-its-about-inspecting-the-process-not-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Sales Management, It&#39;s About Inspecting The Process, Not &#8230; &#171; Improvers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/?p=448#comment-576</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally posted here: Sales Management, It&#039;s About Inspecting The Process, Not &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally posted here: Sales Management, It&#39;s About Inspecting The Process, Not &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

